The Citadels netizens: r3vlibre

jump to main content

A few more words about R3vLibre

1 A few more words about R3vLibre

As written on my introduction to my home page, I spend my life in several areas interlaced, nature, computers, martial arts culture, and fantasy and imaginary through books and roleplaying games that eventually brought me to mythology and spirituality. Other fields of interests that interlace and have bonds with all that, are editing, publishing and networking. In all the senses these words can hvae.

I always needed a commitment to power my desire for action. The theme for that action has been changing (and circling) through time, but I’ve always needed special interest or commitment on something special to feed my motivation.

Among my motivations are a desire to explore and learn, and a willing to seek for the source, the origin of things. That’s how I feel to have strong foundations.

In the field of computers, that led me to seek the understanding of low level and high level in technical practices, and also to collect memories and gather history of a culture I saw growing and I grew up with, the era of BBSes (see the BBS documentary) and the shaping of the Internet, particularly for the interconnections they bring, and the retrocomputing enthusiasm that makes older stuff attractive, as well as practices that made that time, like the demoscene.

It’s not that today’s tool don’t have anything attractive, it’s that the spirit of sharing and creating has shifted to merchandizing, first in the big capital venture platforms where the content and all our interactions are merchandized, then because the audience get polarized into professional commercial creators and (rather) passive consumers. These platforms and tools shape the interactions and our behaviors in that direction, too. Let me state this, it’s not wrong to be an activately participating spectator, many creative content creator and online actors built enthusiast communities. What I address here, is that the tools shape it that way, putting forward a model where some most famous person have "reach" to so called "followers", and that all our behaviors are monitored and merchandized, every like or comment enters a mad money machine having an incidence on our psyche, and pushing forward an endless consumption of ressources that has real impact on the Earth and the life it sustains.

Being happy to see creators having success in creating fruitful content, I can’t thus trash the whole thing. However, it is good to be aware of the processes they bring us into, and that other ways of creating and publishing are possible. The act of creating and sharing was built in since the beginning in the networking adventure (its name actually suggests it, bringing interconnection), and it is still there. Maybe a bit as a subculture, although it is getting more and more visible today. But subcultures have always been too. I want to put these a bit more in the lights.

Of course, all what I am writing today, I can only do it, because many people created marvelous things, and many others wrote about it. I am summarizing what I have learned through time and it is thanks to all those who already talked about these things throughout the years. So, it’s a bit like taking a particular pair of binoculars, and see through my lenses what I feel important in that computer culture.

The World Wide Web (WWW) is the first thing I want to explore. It was made to create content and to have links between the content each of us can publish, at our own numerical places. It was built upon the idea of linking and sharing. The building up of the Internet was like an ecosystem consisting of technicians, academics and enterprises building it, people and academic sharing through it, and commercial services.

Graduately, some businesses became giant corporations (that we’ll call BigTech), that pushed evolutions forwards (not necessarily the only ones, nor for the better), had wide visibility because of their prominence, brought convenience, interactions and communities gathering, among those, what we know today as "social media". They provided free of money, a space to be online and to connect others as long as you followed some rules, notably "staying inside". But this was not without costs.

Everything has a cost of course. But here, this cost is losing what made the principles of the open online communities that built up the Internet from its grounds. While the web was open, and communities had their place in autonomy or semi-autonomy, now communities are scattered through huge closed places they depend on to varying degrees, and are bound to terms involving their data and privacy. This is all well summarized and illustrated in this comic by The Oatmeal: https://theoatmeal.com/comics/reachingpeople2021

Well, many communities, not all of them, resistance and creativity is still there, on a quest for a relative autonomy (relying upon the inter-dependances principles, with chosen tiers). And we can make it grow. This website is one step through that direction. With the help of many fellows, past and future. Bringing back together, rehabilit, an Internet web made of links and sharing, that does not track each online action undertaken.

Additionally, while focusing on building spaces designed for humans, we also need to care for the ressources we use, and to focus on being gentler with the Earth. This leads us to aim at shifting technologies towards small technology and small web, because Small is beautiful (bringing economy where people matter) as fellow tech & human enthousiasts are building and clearing the path with love <3

In this sense, my home page is a statement for my online presence.

Of course, not everybody has the skills, nor the desire to handcraft everything, because they prefer to spend time on what they care and like to craft themselves. But we can create a common good, that is, you can join spaces that people take care collectively for others, it can be a commercial too, but we’ll try to look for places that want to stay at human size. In the social media, having interactions between multiple places is possible thanks to the magic of the Fediverse. Other softwares are available too, a good entry point is Framasoft, it is welcoming and easy to get in. There are many more of course, however you need to start somewhere.

1.1 Interacting with corporate BigTech silos

1.1.1 — Back and forth, a quest for balance

I had the chance to discover Linux while studying at the university. This changed my way of seeing the computer world. First, I really liked the way it was built, I enjoyed myself technically, it empowered my usage of computers. Besides that, I was already aware of freeware and shareware, and I knew from the BBS time that source code could be shared, but I didn’t expect a stance like the Free Software and Open Source movement. From that time, I went away from closed source software and corporate software, except where forced too, and I commited myself to see the open and sharing way grow larger. That commitment came to extend the same way for the Internet and interconnecting computers and communication software (as e-mail and messaging). It didn’t happen that way. Not completely. And if having sources available became a major way of developping software including in BigTech, stuff were closed another way, like becoming too big to be handled at reasonable team size, or running on closed hardware (like phones and many electronic appliances that got even more spred out than the PC, the personal computer).

Given that, and that at the time social media started (with Facebook and Twitter), I took distance from computers outside of my job and e-mails, since I was in my search for spending more life in life, particularly nature, I was reluctant to give a try to it.

Later, I came back to the tech community around free software, and around 2011-2013 I discovered identi.ca, the first platform that launched what we now refer to as the Fediverse. Exploring social media within my community of trust made me make the jump. I then joined the BigTech social media for a while, but I didn’t spend much time there. I had better time on the Fediverse, and in life, and I started reading more and more concerns about these platforms, so my presence just faded away.

Recently (around 2 years ago from writing this, that is summer 2022), I decided to go for a change.

That change started by embracing the principles of the Tao, which are consistant with my own dedication, stating that nothing is utterly good or bad. Even within the dark patterns, there is something good, and the reverse is true too, nothing is perfect when it comes to try "doing it the right way". And, to those wondering, or instantly fighting this idea, this does not mean "to close the eyes" and tolerate everything, it means looking at the whole thing. It does not mean to give up seeking a better way. As the aim is to find balance in taking care of life. And you can only take into account what you are aware of. It’s up to everyone to find its own center (its own values and spheres of importance). At least, in my way of understanding.

This, this does not mean abandonning trying to do it the right way, nor abandonnning its own power however. Indeed, I struggled awhile with another principle, that is "turn away from and don't feed what you don’t want to grow" (which is very practical and a stance within the hacktivists, which happens also to be a way to lead a fight without going into strong opposition). Because I know too well, that using the platform means giving them an audience, and revenues from advertising, thus more power. At at time where it has become obvious and documented that their usage and way of working is hurting democracies and encourage conflicts.

So, it is a question of balance. I went to consider other stuff. Not everybody can make, or want to make the switch. It will take time before that those who would consider making a switch, would actually make it. And others will never make the switch. We won’t run after them. Therefore, the platforms will continue to exist anyway. I can only

This brings us to one more thing, these platforms can be considered a sort of "public place", as Olivier Ertzscheid explains (in French): https://affordance.framasoft.org/2024/06/should-i-stay-or-should-i-go/. Thus, there is a reason, at least for public actors (which I am not), to not leave the place to a single voice, to pursue to bring a plurality of views eventhough the algorithms do play against that in some regards.

With all that up, and for joining a few groups and people that I interact with, I decided knowingly to bring a new online presence in BigTech social medias silos, I am still keeping my own commitment for a better Internet of links and sharing, however, as well as a more vivid life, respectful of the Earth we live on and we live with.

1.2 About nature, fantasy and others…

Well, as I wrote in the early words of my presentation, it suggested that I have other areas of interest than computers, however most of this text is about computers and Internet. Indeed, as I am giving a new impulse to my website, I wanted to make a statement on my online presence. I’ll add more about the other areas later on, maybe here, or maybe split on other websites, I am not sure yet. There is still a lot of space for computer crafting and writing :) In any case, I will update this section when something new arises.